QA and
testing
Testing that tells you whether a release is safe to ship — a written strategy, automated regression where it pays for itself, and manual work where judgement is needed.
What we test
Coverage shaped by what breaks expensively, not by a uniform percentage target.
Release readiness
A repeatable pre-release pass over critical paths, so shipping stops being a decision made on hope.
Automation
Regression suites for the flows that must never break — payment, auth, checkout — running on every pull request.
Integration testing
The seams between services, third parties and payment providers, where most production defects actually live.
Performance and load
Behaviour under realistic traffic, so the limit is found in a test rather than during a campaign.
How we work
Strategy first, automation second — in that order, because automating the wrong checks is expensive.
Test strategy
We map what breaks expensively and agree the coverage that is worth paying for. Not everything deserves a test, and saying so is part of the job.
Suites and CI
Automated checks wired into the pipeline so a failing test blocks a merge, and manual passes reserved for what judgement actually improves.
Reporting
Defects with reproduction steps and severity, plus a release verdict a product owner can act on without reading a test log.
Tools we use
Chosen to fit your stack and your pipeline, not our habit.
PlaywrightReleasing on
hope right now?
Tell us what you ship and how often. We will propose the coverage that pays for itself first.
